The Samsung Galaxy SIV: All Tell, But Nothing To Show [Opinion]

IMG_0565

At one point during Samsung’s tacky Galaxy SIV launch event at the Radio City Music Hall in New York, the emcee — upon asking what the point of a screen that could react to gestures in mid-air without actually touching it, and being treated to a Greek chorus of answers from a constabulary of shrill, histrionic shrews — said of Samsungs new Air Gestures: “Okay, I see how that might be useful.”

Those words really sum up everything Samsung put up on stage tonight. I see how that might be useful.

The Galaxy SIV is a phone largely unchanged from the SIII. It’s a little thinner, a little lighter, a little more powerful. It has a bunch of new features. And all of them require a small one-act play on one of the most important stages in Manhattan to explain why, in a certain circumstance, they might be useful.

I want to be very clear: the Galaxy SIV is just a beautiful phone. Really.

Sure, it doesn’t quite have the chamfered chops of the iPhone 5 or the HTC One, but it feels light in the hand, and thought the body is as plasticky as it ever was (Samsung clearly feels as strongly that easily dropped phones should be made of plastic as Apple does that aluminum and glass are the base matter of a well-designed universe) this is a good looking, beautifully designed device, just like the SIII before it. Maybe a little more so!

But just a little. It’s a little thinner. A little lighter. The screen’s a little bigger. It’s a little more powerful. It’s iterative, not revolutionary, or even evolutionary. Does that matter, though?

You know, I think it’s okay to say that maybe, just maybe, smartphones have been honed to the point where it’s just not possible to revolutionize them every year. It’s okay to just refine them, to scrape away the little bits of gristle and bone that still cling to the femur until you’re left with a bleached bone that represents a truly perfect smartphone experience.

Samsung’s got its own idea of what a smartphone should be, in other words. A big, plasticky device that is hard to break, super powerful and looks, well, like a Galaxy S III. Or SIV. Or Galaxy Note II. Because they all pretty much look the same now. But I’m okay with that. Like I said, it’s a beautiful phone, and in its construction, about the only thing I have a problem with is the “purity” of the materials used: I’m a glass-and-aluminum man, myself.

So it all boils down to the features. And that’s the problem, because tonight, what Samsung showed off was gimmick after gimmick. Features no one will use except in very specific circumstances… so specific, that Samsung actually felt the need to put on small miniature plays illustrating the use of each one.

Oh, sure, Samsung try to spin it. “We’re in the greatest theater in the world, so let’s put on a show for you!” the M.C. jovially cried.

What followed a pageantry of pedestrianism, in which the finest of New York’s under-employed off-Broadway up-and-comers came out and earnestly squirted out lines written for them by marketers and PR drones, all centered around a pervasive theme: “That seems like it could be useful.”

Watch, for example, as the Galaxy SIV’s new ability to add a snapshot of the photographer (and the sound of his voice!) are inserted into a shot of what he is actually taking a picture of, extolled in a small vignette about a father agonizing about how to take a family portrait while also being the photographer of said portrait.

Yeah, in that situation, that feature seems like it could be useful.

Behold the virtues of the Galaxy SIV’s ability to be controlled with mid-air gestures instead of touch by five shrieking harpies who can’t touch their smartphone screen because their hands are too sticky, or mid-manicure, or filled with wine glasses, or occupied with dish-doing, or wearing Audrey Hepburn style theater gloves.

Well, yes, in that situation, that feature seems like it could be useful.

Or what about the smelly backpacker trekking through Europe who gets an email from a friend who doesn’t speak English, telling him which city they should meet in next, and whose Galaxy SIV automatically translates the email for him?

Yeah, that seems like it could be useful.

Or what about the father filming his son’s tap dancing recital, who gets a perfect shot, but needs the Samsung Galaxy SIV to remove the mooning drunk from the background before sending it to Grandma?

Totally. That could be useful, if that happened.

You get the picture.

Yes, these are all cool little software tricks… but at best, they’re ideas for apps you download off of Google Play, not features you launch a new flagship smartphone around. They are gimmicks that will be used by an infinitesmally small subset of users, their utility conveyed with an jaw-dropping degree of tackiness.

The truth is, Samsung thinks the Galaxy SIV is pretty much perfect. That’s why they aren’t really changing how it looks, or how it feels: physically, it’s a very routine hardware update. But in the era of integrated software, hardware and services, you can’t sell a smartphone based upon a faster processor, or more megapixels, or more RAM.. and when it comes right down to it, that’s what is most important to Samsung, which is why everything else just feels so stapled on, so artlessly extolled.

There’s nothing wrong with grounding a hardware upgrade in software upgrades, but here’s the thing: the utility of a new software feature has to be obvious. You need to show, not tell.

This, more than anything else, is Apple’s greatest strength over Samsung when it comes to selling their products to consumers: they can just show you a new feature in action, and it clicks. It works. A hole you never knew existed in the way you interact with computers is suddenly filled. Samsung doesn’t know how to do that, and so they spend three dollars to Apple’s one to try to impart what the point of the products they are making is.

As near as we could tell, the Galaxy SIV is a pretty good phone (although in our brief hands-on testing, none of the gesture or face-tracking software worked as well as Samsung claimed it did, if at all). If you are in the market for an Android smartphone, this is going to be the one you’re probably going to buy.

But Samsung seems like it has run out of tricks. There’s so little to show here that all they could do is tell. Tonight’s launch event proved that Samsung’s entire mobile strategy is, at best, to bludgeon you with claims of their product’s merits untl you give in. And at worst, as they did this evening? They’ll bludgeon you while they bore you.

Apps you might like

  • http://twitter.com/krfraj Fidlee

    Samsung is waiting for the next iPhone to copy from. For the time being they copied apps available in the Play store.

    • http://twitter.com/VolofTN Todd Murphy

      And Apple hasn’t ever integrated features found in the App Store..

      • http://www.facebook.com/chief.pufablunt Tony Warbucks

        how to instantly spot a butthurt android fan? Use of the word “innovate”.LOL do you here yourself? lmao go outside and get some air…it will all be ok

        • OptimusL

          And not once was that word used in his post, punch yourself in the d*ck.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=108700350 David Cornish

      And Apple didn’t copy any features when they made the iPhone? They copied features that were in PDA’s, remember those?

      So where’s that iPhone that has a 1920×1080 screen with 441 ppi that Samsung copied?

      • Emily

        I didn’t realize Apple had interchangeable batteries, and a more rounded body….maybe Samsung are time travelers that looked into the future and copied Apple in the future o.o

        • Andrew

          Wow, interchangeable batteries and a more rounded body. Your right, what was I thinking…Samsung can really innovate.

      • Andrew

        Hey Sammy Boys Apple did a high res. screen…let’s out innovate them and do an even higher high res. screen. Yea! that will show them who can innovate.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=108700350 David Cornish

          Seeing as how Apple made a high res screen, slapped the Retina marketing tag on it, and then called it innovation, I’d say it’s fair game for Samsung to do the same.

          • Andrew

            of course it is fair game, duh. You just made my point, that’s what they do…copy Apple.

          • http://twitter.com/nmPraveen Praveen

            Come on man.. Making big screen is not a huge innovation. How about they openly copied Siri as S-Voice, Passbook as Wallet..?

          • http://www.facebook.com/joe.tavormina Joe Tavormina

            A 5 inch 1080p amoled screen is a big innovation, Tech bloggers said it could not be manufactured and Samsung did it. Samsung is the leader in display technology. Apple just buys the technology. Retina displays are not made or designed by apple, they buy the displays and slap the word retina on them. The ipad retina display is not made or designed by apple, they buy the display from sharp and samsung. Please do some research and you will find that there is not a single IOS device that uses an apple made display.

            2012 patents awarded
            samsung 5081
            apple 1136

            buying other companies products and having them assembled by another company (foxcom) is not innovation.

          • http://twitter.com/nmPraveen Praveen

            I hope you knew that Samsung makes tons of things other than mobile. So patent numbers doesn’t make sense unless you specifically say how many patent were related to mobile/tablet.

          • http://www.facebook.com/joe.tavormina Joe Tavormina

            Yes Samsung makes “tons of things”, but they are the first and only company in the world to design, produce and use a 5 inch 1080p amoled display.
            I am sure apple can order the display from Samsung and slap the name SUPER RETINA on it and call innovation.

          • http://twitter.com/nmPraveen Praveen

            OMG dude. Why you are so bragging about 5″screen. Note 2 has bigger screen than S4. Its just a screen size. Same technology, just expanding and contracting as we chose.

          • http://twitter.com/xTradaTrade JJ

            Please stop posting, you’re making Android phone users look dumb. I love my Note 2 but I have it thanks to the innovation brought on by Apple.
            Samsung is a contract manufacturer, that’s why they supply the parts. But not for long, TMSC, Sharp, etc will be supplying Apple’s future parts. Apple designs (hint the hard work) and contractors build it.

            If you still don’t get it. Let me ask you a question. What takes more brainpower the Architect (Apple) that designs a building or the construction company that actually builds it (Samsung)???

            That’s not to say Samsung isn’t innovating. They are, just look at my Note 2, it’s the only Android phone to get. Samsung is an excellent Execution company and now they are getting into the innovation game. So things should become interesting.

          • http://www.facebook.com/joshua.d.deville Joshua David DeVille

            LOL siri wasn’t made by apple it was purchased by them, passbook rip off of Google wallet which has been around longer. They also ripped off 4 inch screen drop down notifications, oh and the ipad mini? 7 inch andriod tablets have been around long before that.

            Seriously these phones look nothing alike, complete different build complete different OS’s unless you think the color white? or a small button are copy cats? Even the button is a different shape.

        • http://www.facebook.com/joe.tavormina Joe Tavormina

          Apple did not invent the high rez screen, they buy the screens form samsung or lg/sharp. GS4 has a 1920×1080 full HD display. Iphone 5 has a 1136 x 640 NON HD display made by lg not apple. ALL IOS devices ,including apple TV, use Samsung CPUs. Samsung phones use mostly samsung parts while IOS devices use other suppliers as well as samsung parts. The new retina macbook pro uses a samsung screen. Macbook pros with LG retina displays are been replaced with samsung screens because of ghosting problems. Please name me one apple product that uses a apple made screen.

          • Andrew

            That’s stupid, stupid. But thanks for making my case for me. As you well know Apple does not manufacture screens, they buy them but the point you are missing is that Apple was the first to move to a high-res screen, since Apple does not make the screens anyone could have. Especially Samsung since they manufacture they own. Now Samsung does a little more high-res and all the Samsung fan-boys jump up and down and holler “true Innovation.” Innovation my ass. Not only is it not innovative it may not even be necessary, since if your eye cannot tell the difference why use it. What Samsung does is innovate technically and they are very good at it. But what you seem to be confused about, is that technical innovation does not equate to product innovation. High-res amoelid screens are cool but it takes more than technical innovation to make an outstanding innovative product; it takes taste, refinement, class; all types of characteristics I do not understand. And only Apple has pulled it all together into elegant products, Samsung, like the rest of the tech industry, has not. That is why they copy. Douce bag.

          • http://www.facebook.com/joe.tavormina Joe Tavormina

            So Samsung designs, produces, and sells the hi rez displays to Apple and you credit apple for the innovation. I guess the design of the first ever 1080p amoled 5 inch display is not innovation. Samsung supplies the cpu, screens, nand memory as well as other parts for IOS devices How can Samsung copy a high rez screen from Apple, when Apple gets the screens from Samsung in the first place. Does apple have a 1080p screen? Apple does not even have a 720p screen. So please tell me what screen tech Samsung copied from apple.

            Slapping the retina name on a sumsung screen does not count as innovation.

            by the way this is the part number for the A6 cpu chip used in the
            iphone 5
            Samsung part number: K3PE7E700F-XGC2

          • Andrew

            one can lead a horse to water but one cannot make him drink. Did you read my post? Good luck with your Samsung phones.

          • http://www.facebook.com/joe.tavormina Joe Tavormina

            Good luck with your Apple phones, made with Samsung parts and technology, and assembled by Foxcom.

          • Andrew

            Thanks, but Apple phones don’t need luck.

    • Emily

      Wait…where can I get that eye motion thing on the App Store

      • Brrriiiaaallliiiaaannnttt

        Exactly, ‘eye motion thing’. No one can even explain what it really is or why? The only use case that made sense was pausing the video by looking up, but why not just quickly do one tap of the ‘pause button’ with a finger that is necessarily already on the phone. I’ll hold judgement until I use it, but this isn’t a ‘game changer’ but more of a gimmick…

      • jonreyn3

        Play Store isn’t App Store.

      • http://profiles.google.com/jayq330 Jonathan Oquendo

        You rather have an app running constantly in the background just so it could pause a video for you? Here are 2 facts that Samsung knows about human nature, 1 is how lazy some have become that they rather have an app monitoring them constantly to pause or dial for them, 2 no one ever thought that other companies ever thought of these same types of app’s that fall into the gimmicky, processing & energy consuming background app’s that will rarely get used enough to justify what they are used for in the first place. It’s not there lack of ideas, its three common sense, because anyone can put these unto there phones and do it better, just ask LG.

    • Guest

      +1

    • http://profiles.google.com/jayq330 Jonathan Oquendo

      Exactly my point, everything they have can be had for free or paid *for better versions*, which is why the HTC one is the phone for me, better quality aluminum, higher grade than the aluminum used in iPhone 5, lithium polymer battery *better & could last longer than 2600mah lithium ion battery* better camera, GPS actually works, has the same snapdragon 600 ass the gs4 *which scores just ass high as exynos5 octo8, same situation as with the dual core s4 vs quad core exynos4*, even the sense 5 is better than its pervious versions because they can now use visual techniques that sale wouldn’t allow because of patent’s; they use a more efficient visual c++ that’s as smooth as iOS without the need of project butter, but with project butter will be even smoother. They have beats audio stereo speakers, almost all there hardware is exclusive, not just software which can be copied & used with any snapdragon 600 phone that’s out. That’s why I don’t understand why they’re fascinated over this cheap plastic galaxy s3S I mean 4, when all they did was take the short road buy spending money they should of spent on the phones hardware aspect instead of a stupid Shiite that just said GIMMICKS in bold neon lights. Htc worked hard& they showed it, they searched my money. They’re noted better publicity of the things they put into there phones& open people’s eyes to show be Sammy is getting lazy. They say there’s always so much you can innovate? That’s what they’re saying now, well htc seems to have what it takes to keep innovating when others don’t.

  • http://twitter.com/VolofTN Todd Murphy

    Wow.. What would you expect any smartphone manufacturer to show you this year that would impress you? You blast Samsung for evolution instead of revolution but then say the industry has come to that. I think it’s a great device: 1080P, 13 MP camera, more software features, exchangeable batteries (that is a nice feature for power users), but yet, none of that seems good enough for the tone of this article. I saw more innovation from Samsung in the past year than 2 years from Apple. Oh that’s right, Apple have us a 4″ screen along with LTE.

    • Emily

      Don’t forget, it also is a little thinner, a little lighter, and a little more powerful…but that of course is revolutionary

    • Andrew

      The point being, Android Fanbot, is that Samsung does not innovate, they copy. And they just showed again that they can only copy: is a larger screen an innovation? is copying some apps an innovation? Name one innovation that Samsung has done that will not bore your audience to tears…what you say? “a removable battery for power users”…oh yea! Why didn’t I think of that.

    • Brrriiiaaallliiiaaannnttt

      Yea, it is a speced bumped phone with the same form factor…nothing wrong with that at all, but did that warrant a Broadway production? A really, really bad Broadway production?

    • brownlee

      What are you talking about? I didn’t “blast” Samsung for being evolutionary instead of revolutionary. In fact, I said that was OKAY, and spent an entire paragraph laboring that point. Do any of you idiots even read?

  • Emily

    So the device changes slightly from one year to the next? Getting both thinner and lighter than its predecessor and you say that it is basically doesn’t matter? What about the iPhone 4s to iPhone 5. I’m pretty sure that was also a little thinner, a little lighter, a little more powerful. And you claim that it is revolutionary. What about the iPhone 4 to iPhone 4s, that barely even made a change and yet, “All hail the revolutionary Apple for releasing a crap voice assistant.” Hypocritical much.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=108700350 David Cornish

      Yep, it’s hypocritical, and blatant fanboyism.

      • Emily

        Thank you, at least someone sees it!

        • Andrew

          Sees what? Name me one thing that Samsung has innovated that they have not copied from Apple that will not bore me to tears. And don’t even mention that eye and hand motion thing until you know it is useful.

          • http://www.facebook.com/chief.pufablunt Tony Warbucks

            but on an entirely different note does nobody know how most asian markets work? there is no r&d.. people buy a smartphone and instantly become “smart” on worldwide markets and manufacturers..

    • http://www.facebook.com/chief.pufablunt Tony Warbucks

      MARKETING..has ruined your life/perspective…..WTF here seriously looked at the phone and went “BY SCOTT THAT IS REVOLUTIONARY!”…..really?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Muhammad-Marsh/693934988 Muhammad Marsh

      Exactly! When Apple makes minor changes to their devices it’s all ok. But when another company does it, but to a better extent, it is disappointing and useless. The hypocrisy is astounding. -_-

      But having said that, this should have been called the S3 plus. Much like the iphone 5 should have been called the iphone 4Ss.

    • jonreyn3

      Have you held an iPhone 4s and an iPhone 5 in both hands and compared the two? The iPhone 5 doesn’t feel just “a little lighter.” It’s a little more powerful and a little thinner but the impressive thing about it was that it was able to pull all that off while making the screen .5 inches bigger, including LTE that didn’t exist before, and incorporate a new display technology (even if it’s not Apple’s) without compromising battery life and the finish of the phone. I had an iPhone 4 when the 4s was released and I didn’t think Siri was worth the upgrade, and I still don’t. But if it weren’t so revolutionary, I don’t see why all other handset makers and Google felt the need to include it in theirs.

      • http://profiles.google.com/jayq330 Jonathan Oquendo

        Because Google has had voice actions, voice activation for app’s, and questions answered threw Google, even voice translation. Google Android just never thought of it ass something so big as to exaggerate it’s use like apple did & does with everything.

    • brownlee

      Again, not what I said. Jeez, guys. Don’t let your knees jerk up and break your nose.

    • Andrew

      No sweetheart we didn’t say it didn’t matter, we merely said they copy Apple. They got a little thinner, a little bigger and a little faster; where have you heard that one before (for the slow, think 4s to 5).

  • Andrew

    The point being Android Fanbots is that Samsung does not innovate, they copy. And they just showed again that they can only copy: is a larger screen an innovation? is coping some apps an innovation? Name one innovation that Samsung has done that will not bore your audience to tears…what you say? an removable battery for power users…oh yea! Why didn’t I think of that.

  • Andrew

    OMG!….the new Samsung has such cutting edge features: a new hi-res screen and a speedy processor plus a whole bunch of stupid features no body will likely use. What incredible innovation!…The new Samsung is the old Samsung only bigger, thinner and lighter. Now what does that remind you of? I’m sure Samsung will come out with even more incredible innovations just shortly after the next Apple model arrives.

  • http://www.facebook.com/chief.pufablunt Tony Warbucks

    i love how slowly EVERYTHING that was a complaint about iphone is now becoming androids standards……wow talk about i told you so

  • http://www.facebook.com/chief.pufablunt Tony Warbucks

    how to instantly spot a butthurt android fan? Use of the word “innovate”.LOL do you here yourself? wtf do you guys think you are scientists? 99% of you play angry birds lag free have a seat.

  • Cottonswab

    This article is “a little bit better” than crap stuck on the bottom of my shoe. Apple releases a new model phone and it’s also a “little bit better” than the last model. *COUGH* Hypocrite *COUGH* Apple did not invent hi-res displays, those screens were by Samsung, now along with LG/Sharp. Nor, the chips and hardware inside any of the iPhones, i.e. LTE/GSM radios, memory chips, ARM CPU/GPUs. Oh and it was revolutionary to go from a 3.5″ screen to a 4″ screen … yeah right.

    • http://twitter.com/xTradaTrade JJ

      Yeah, and Stephen Sauvestre (architect/designer) didn’t invent the Eiffel Tower, because it was built by Compagnie des Etablissements (construction company).

  • Alexander Gold

    Nothing to show hah lol, it’s more than iPhone 5 has to show, multi window is amazing i’m pro iPhone too but now galaxy s4 definitely more superior in all sences , if we not see gigantic change in iPhone 6 from software side apple will lose it’s market …

    • jonreyn3

      *senses *its
      I do admit multiwindow is nice but it comes with limited app support and I really don’t see a lot of people using it even though I know plenty of people with Note 2s around me.

  • http://twitter.com/boblevel boblevel

    Agreed. I was planning on upgrading to the S4 from S3, but I just don’t see enough ‘Wow’ factor to justify the expense.

    • http://twitter.com/xTradaTrade JJ

      I think Samsung is trying to get S3 users to upgrade. They are probably going to play Apple’s two year upgrade plan (smart) because that’s the popular length of mobile contracts.

  • Brrriiiaaallliiiaaannnttt

    This is the most spot on review out there…you nailed it John…Kudos!

  • bondr006

    John! You hit the nail right on the head. I wanted to get excited while watching this last night, but I couldn’t see anything past all the terrible acting…..which left me feeling relly empty about the SIV. I will keep and be happy with my iPhone 5 which has never left me wanting….

    • Andrew

      I agree, I was worried about Samsung there for awhile, because they make a good product, and their Asians. They move fast (racist or not it appears to be true). But they seem to be doing the Microsoft dance but faster: throw more unnecessary features into a product and call it better. More features do not make a better product, probably less features do, but having the judgement to pick which features are needed and to make them all work together in harmony is how a great product is made. Truly I am now worried less about Apple, after this latest Samsung foray.

  • http://twitter.com/gnomehole The Gnome

    Good honest review of the S3S. Now ANdroid fans start to see you can’t blow people away year after year like we’d all love… these devices have come so far, its tough to be magical every time. Looks like Samesung left the door open to the other Android makers this time around…

  • ezflyer

    Funny how whether its Apple or Samsung or any other phone, we are all amazed and look forward to the next best thing…we get wowed by the new features for about 5 minutes and then say, is that all? The public is never satisfied as what used to be the cutting edge is old. These phones are nothing but miniaturized computers and eventually, there will be only so much that they can do before they will all be the same. Of course as you notice, the internal batteries are getting larger and so on….all that screen and the power….now on to the next major phone release.

  • Damien

    To be honest, I’m really swayed by the new features that were presented in the unveiling. But like what the author wrote, they should have done more ‘live’ demos of those features rather than playing pre-recorded videos for simulation.

  • crankerchick

    You can’t be serious with this. Try harder next time not to look like an admittedly biased Apple fan looking for anything to attack on the new Android flagship phone. Apple iteratively updates the iPhone, makes one or two changes in a major update of the OS, and calls it the best iPhone yet, but Samsung does arguably the same thing and it’s somehow not enough? Not that I would use probably any of the many software features added to the GSIV, at least Samsung added many software nuggets to Android. While the hardware may have been an iterative update, the software additions certainly are not, which is more than can be said for Apple. And yes, I use an iPhone, iPad, and MacBook Pro Retina everyday and hardly consider myself bias to one platform or another. I enjoy mobile technology in general, Android included, and see the merits in each. Yes, many of Samsung’s software additions are gimmicky, but they are, in fact, there to be used or ignored. Apple, on the other hand, really needs to do something in iOS 7, less they release another iterative hardware AND software update, and you write how the iterative update is plentiful. Give me a break.

    • http://twitter.com/xTradaTrade JJ

      He’s probably disappointed. The difference is Apple has the features working when they hold their events. It’s not half baked like this Sammy event was. Regardless, I’m waiting on the Note 3, that should be the real killer for this year.

  • valvolux2

    At least they’ve added things. IOS practically hasn’t changed in 3/ years…all of their additions, hundreds of them apparently….are so minute I haven’t spotted one of them (my work forces me to use one). Then they added siri….which was something we never realised we didn’t need until we used it. I might add its still 100 percent useless for anything but weather in Australia. And how about maps…ios6 actually was a downgrade. The barometer, the health stuff, the infra red blaster, the awesome camera interface (sorry apple, panorama and HDR does not make an interface) and a 1080p amoled display….these aren’t gimmicks like siri…these are dam useful things that make people go wow….something the iPhone hasn’t done since the original.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jayq330 Jonathan Oquendo

    If Sammy ran out of ways to innovate on there galaxy s phones they should take a few pointers from HTC or listen to the customers. The galaxy 4 is just the galaxy note, being standardized into the norm. Look at what HTC did with the HTC one x a beautiful phone when released & kept improving with the quad core HTC one XL & so on. Now the next generation HTC one is so revolutionized that it’s camera is a new category on its own, it’s double wafered Mic’s are also new to the mobile world, it’s front stereo speakers are so obviously perfect you wonder why didn’t anyone do this before? & then you have this unibody without a single seem, a single gap, almost as if more than a unibody. There’s no excuse for Sammy to keep there standards down, if only they’d have put some stereo speakers, even if in an odd place like behind the phone, or like the iPhone on the bottom edge, or one in the bottom & one on the top edge… See it all comes down to keeping their profits above average as high & as much as they can juice it. I’m going to the HTC one with my aluminum body, beautiful speakers & a u.i. that isn’t held back by apples lawyers & hounds imagine a interface ass smooth ass iOS without project butter, now imagine it in combination with project butter, c++ animations, efficient animations that don’t lag, they are really striving for the people & our wallets, they didn’t give up & say you know what let’s just give them the same old shit with a bigger screen, they actually went ask out & they won’t stop with real innovation on the hardware level, an image chip! Cmon & what software the galaxy 4 has that I like I’ll get from third party if the HTC one doesn’t have it yet. But the Samsung 4 only has one exclusive hardware that is or was great & that’s there super amoled screen. The super lcd3 already has I’d say about 95% of the amoled’s properties & contrast, but with better viewing angles. I guarantee that there next hardware implementation will be something like a beats dual speakers in one, who knows, but I know this they both have the same heart the snapdragon 600 making them equally as powerful in gaming & processing & for those that don’t know about the exynos5 octo being a bit weaker than snapdragon 600 Google it, it’s called “arm big.little soc” it’s basically the same story with the dual core s4 vs exynos4 quad core. Believe me & do some research, Samsung has the hype but ass this article states & many more people say it’s all gimmicks.

  • Patrick

    Last I checked, doesn’t samsung make the screens and the chips for the iphone??? And the iphone hasn’t has a real “innovation” in a long time. True, the s4 has a lot of gimmicks. At least they are evolving.

    • Jesse Mentzer

      I dot know how often this stupid excuse is given. Samsung *manufactures* the parts. They do not design or create or perfect the part. That is Apples job. I am no Apple fanboy either. I ditched the iPhone for android and the Nexus 4 the day it came out.

About the author

John BrownleeJohn Brownlee is news editor here at Cult of Android, as well as our sister site, Cult of Mac. He has written about a lot of things for a lot of different places, including Wired, Playboy, Boing Boing, Popular Mechanics, VentureBeat, Gizmodo, Kotaku, Lifehacker, AMC, Geek and the Consumerist. He lives in Somerville, Massachusetts with his charming inamorata and two tiny budgerigars punningly christened after Nabokov's most famous perverts. You can follow him here on Twitter.

email hidden; JavaScript is required| Read more posts by .

Posted in Android, News | Tagged: , |


scribol